Does the SIP committee have to obey its own precedent ?
Especially across features and time
6% on such a test with such high variability depending on the project and usage is a measurement error.
6% on unsigned Integers which are trivial to benchmark with low variance is significant.
It is not the same.
1 Like
Probably not. I am unaware of any guidelines in that direction. But it would make decisions more credible i guess.
True, they are not. An other difference is that you can choose if you want to take the performance hit by using unsigned integers or not. With the proposed transformation you are just hit by it if you code is already using default Seq.