John refuses to answer the question about Seth:
Because: “happy to answer more, but not in a venue or a way that stokes the fires”
Which I (private opinion) read in John speech as “no dude, I didn’t, otherwise I could say”.
Thus, no matter how I appreciate Seth’s work, I can not trust his intend towards ZIO.
That is a biggie, and it looks like it is swept under the carpet, I gather so we can let go of scalaz ?
At this moment, having observed all communications today in this thread.
I’m sorry, but we need to keep this open.
Why did Seth not wait till ZIO was split of and only then remove scalaz with CoC violation.
Perhaps @SethTisue can apologise for his commit openly without one-on-one talk with John.
That would currently satisfy me to close the thread.
You all are doing a step in the right direction, but as @tpolecat personal opinion predicted:
It’s not sufficient to make it a purely positive step though, hence this thread cannot yet be closed.